Mobile Testing with Simulators, Emulators, & Physical Devices: Understanding the Difference

Mobile Testing with Simulators, Emulators, & Physical Devices: Understanding the Difference

Mobile testing today has become a nightmare due to the huge number of devices and configurations that mobile apps and websites need to be cross-checked against. These tests must confirm the smooth running of apps if an organization wants to retain and grow its database of users – who can, otherwise, very easily move on to other apps by competitors.

Thankfully, today we have a host of debugging tools for testing the apps thoroughly, end-to-end. These tools may be categorized into three broad categories: emulators, simulators, or real devices. Well, there are a lot of people who may say that emulators and simulators must be clubbed as a single group – sure, if mimicking the outer behaviour of an object may be considered the same as mimicking the internal behaviour of an object. Real device testing does what the name implies – tests the apps as they run on your smart phones. Let’s take a deeper look at the categories.

While testing on a real device requires the use of the actual phone, emulators and simulators are based on the concept of virtual testing. Virtual testing involves testing the software that provides the same functionality as provided by the real phone.

For testing mobile apps, an emulator may be a desktop application that mimics the hardware and OS of the applications to be tested. A simulator does not mimic the hardware/OS, but rather the basic behavior of a device. While simulators are usually simpler, they are not as useful as emulators. Real device testing checks the functionality of mobile applications to ensure that the app will work as desired.

Related :   Non-Functional Testing Aspects of Mobile Apps

Emulators provide better results (vis a vis simulators) as they can be used to test specific situations, and also mimic multiple devices. While a lot of device manufacturers create simulators, Emulators are often used more as they are relatively cheaper – specifically if compared to real devices.

Emulators & Simulators vs. Mobile Devices

Let us try to compare what provides better benefits in the following scenarios:

  • Define the Product RoadmapSituation-based scenarios: In situation-based (read deadline driven) scenarios, buying required mobile devices may be tough – while using the emulator/simulator may take care of the need. That said, not all the scenarios might be tested as required – which is possible if testing on the mobile.
  • Define the Product RoadmapEase-of-use scenarios: Emulators or Simulators make testing the plethora of apps on the multiple mobile devices available today much easier, but they miss out on testing the UI and UX aspects of testing an app using a mobile – including testing the color and brightness display.
  • Define the Product RoadmapEase-of-access scenarios: Testing on mobile devices is reliable – however, testing on Emulators and Simulators makes it easier as all that is needed is a URL for the app.
  • Define the Product RoadmapValidating battery scenarios: Mobile devices can perform this test as required whereas emulators and simulators usually are not able to mimic issues related to battery.
  • Define the Product RoadmapValidating performance: This is a very crucial part of testing a mobile application. Testing the performance of an app on a mobile device usually gives a more accurate result as compared to when tested on emulators or simulators.
Related :   10 Critical Activities to Test Security of Mobile Applications

So which is the better option?

While both Emulators and Simulators look like great alternatives for testing apps, they have issues that may generate both false positive and negative results, which will surely have a negative impact on the organizations’ ROI. Another disadvantage is that howsoever much close they may be to the real app, they may still not cover all features/situations and the results obtained may not be as accurate as you would want them to be.

Real device testing wins big over either of the two with QA Testing that can check for every possible scenario.

However, as they always say, it’s never advisable to put all your eggs in one basket. All three options have their own benefits, and can be used according to the need, helping the organizations meet their needs.

Conclusion

While mobile testing challenges may be many and overwhelming, Gallop’s state-of-the-art mobile test lab uses the latest and best in mobile testing to bring you better quality and quicker time-to-market. Reach out to us today and we will be happy to help you with right mobile app testing strategy.
Read more on Mobile Test Automation and how to select right tools and right approach in our Whitepaper. Download here.

Banner_01

The opinions expressed in this blog are author's and don't necessarily represent Gallop's positions, strategies or opinions.

Gallop Solutions

Gallop Solutions is North America's largest Independent Software Testing Services & company operating since 2003 with offices in Philadelphia & California. Our services are backed by Proprietary Testing IP (Enterprise Test Acceleration Suite - ETAS) for enhanced productivity and in-house R&D teams.